You asked for it!

Posted by Rachel in on 29 Jul. 2003, 11:01 pm

A wedding update you say???? The date is looming you say???? Well, here you go! As you may or may not know, Glen, who is the most involved groom I’ve ever met, was very specific about the invitations. So, it was his quest to design them. Putting this task off to the very last minute, as so often the best procrastinators do, it was a little bit of a stress-fest. We combed the internet for paper suppliers, finally finding one, choosing an invitation paper, and having it overnighted to us so that Glen could get right to work!

Well, spending a fortune in shipping meant we had to save money in the printing! So, this weekend we turned my room into a print shop. The cats were banned and the invitations came flying off of my printer at a stunning rate of 1 invitation per minute! For being printed on an inkjet, they look pretty good, if I do say so myself. They were allowed to dry for several hours while spread all over my bed, and then Glen would not allow them to be stacked too high overnight for fear of smearing. Well, the precautions paid off and we managed to ward off the smearing demon.

Those of you who are receiving invitations will note the following features: (Sorry strangers who may read the blog - we can’t invite everyone, especially if we don’t know you)

1. The font has been especially chosen so that you can read it. I know many people have forgotten how to read that ancient script called cursive long ago, and those people probably have signatures that have deteriorated into a series of loops, exemplified by Glen’s scrawl that he calls a signature.
2. Nowhere on the invitation will you find “two-thousand and three”. Yes, that’s right folks, we’re bucking convention, tradition, and etiquette and writing numbers as actual numbers on our invitations.

Did you enjoy this update? If so, perhaps I will begin a discussion as to what color the bridesmaids should get for their shoes…..

  1. Comment from Em on 30 Jul. 2003, 7:37 am :

    Absolutely! Bridesmaids unite to demand a shoe conversation!

  2. Comment from Angela on 30 Jul. 2003, 9:25 am :

    Silver! Sparkly Shiny Silver with Super Shimmery Silvery Sparkles!

  3. Comment from Angela on 30 Jul. 2003, 9:30 am :

    Can you tell I’m really excited about those invites? Bring on those embossed daisies!

  4. Comment from Kanishka on 30 Jul. 2003, 12:24 pm :

    I here the groomsmen are wearing red Chuck Taylor high tops. Maybe the bridesmaids should match us.

  5. Comment from Tammy on 30 Jul. 2003, 1:15 pm :

    I saw some excellent strappy silver sandals in Nordstrom a month or so ago… $30!

  6. Comment from Angela on 30 Jul. 2003, 2:38 pm :

    I saw the same ones!

  7. Comment from Freda on 31 Jul. 2003, 2:18 pm :

    I really should visit more often. My head spins thinking about the wedding detail headaches to come. Anyhow… shoes yess- I’m flexible- black more practical but silver is cuter

In a car with no name

Posted by Glen in on 28 Jul. 2003, 8:24 pm

It was raining when I arrived in the desert today, which was very odd. The desert has a strong, musty odor when it rains, something that I had never experienced. Then again, I have only been to the desert a few times. This week I am in Prescott, Arizona, working on a few simulators at Embry-Riddle (the traveling “scam” continues, as a wise sister observed). I had the misfortune of flying into Phoenix, which is sprawling something fierce. The population seems to be exploding out here, judging by the number of new strip malls being constructed with names like “Frontier Village Center” (contents: one Wal-Mart, one Home Depot, and one Target) and the many half-finished, new subdivisions out among the cacti. In downtown Phoenix I noticed some of those big cacti (what are they called?) that had been planted much like the sad, sad palm trees in Ocean City, Maryland. Once outside the city, however, I discovered that they actually grow in the wild here. Huh. I also saw a roadrunner running across the road in front of me in the Prescott National Forest, but sadly there was no coyote chasing after it. Anyway, this seems to be a decent area, despite the desertness of it all. At least they have hills here.

In other news, the pace of the wedding planning has stepped up a notch. Maybe Rachel will provide an update if we beg her…

  1. Comment from Mark on 28 Jul. 2003, 9:16 pm :

    I concur. With the rate of wedding-related postings, we’d be excused for thinking that the big date is anything but looming.

  2. Comment from Kanishka on 29 Jul. 2003, 7:59 am :

    I hope you don’t get tired of the traveling “scam” the way I have. Remember: consolidate your miles!

  3. Comment from Your sister on 29 Jul. 2003, 8:58 am :

    Those are saguaro cacti– I think Arizona is the only place in the world they grow naturally, but I could be wrong.

  4. Comment from Angela on 29 Jul. 2003, 9:11 am :

    Did you see any fires from the plane? When you take off from Sky Harbor, look for the orange groves below. Phoenix has sprawled and developers have razed down most of them but what’s left makes the city look an oasis.

  5. Comment from Your sister on 29 Jul. 2003, 9:54 am :

    I had a vague plan to fly out there this weekend on the spur of the moment and see you, but the best airfare I could find is $700.

  6. Comment from Katie on 31 Jul. 2003, 9:13 pm :

    I too, was recently in Arizona. We experienced a lightning show through it and New Mexico. Quite a sight to see!

  7. Comment from Glen on 5 Aug. 2003, 11:00 pm :

    What do you mean, through Arizona?! Tell me you stopped to see Arizona!

Favorite font

Posted by Glen in on 20 Jul. 2003, 6:43 pm

After agonizing for hours over which font to use on the wedding invitations, I am leaning toward Wingdings. Not only will the invitations be unique and non-scripty (my two requirements), but guests will experience the added joy of decoding the words.

  1. Comment from Angela on 20 Jul. 2003, 11:14 pm :

    Your latest posts seem to indicate that you’re going out of your mind…

    Hey, why not Bembo for the font? The invites will be elegant with a subtle touch of Terp pride ;-)

  2. Comment from Your sister on 21 Jul. 2003, 8:41 am :

    Outside the Subway sandwich shop yesterday, I discarded my soda into a trash can– and was horrified to see, nestled in beside the sandwich wrappers, old newspapers, and soda cans, a beautiful wedding invitation. It was the sort that ties with a ribbon and has an overlay of vellum. Clearly the product of many hours of discussion, negotiations, and agonizing… and yet a heartless guest had simply tossed it into the trash bin. Flashbacks of the wedding-invitation selection process flooded my brain, and for a few moments I stood there, paralyzed. Then the traumatic memory receded and I drove away, my illusions shattered… realizing that we could have sent e-vites to our guests just as easily as the lovely $400 invitations.

  3. Comment from Nick on 21 Jul. 2003, 12:20 pm :

    May I suggest Futura Condensed ExtraBold? Nothing says classy like invitations printed with the same font as Absolut Vodka bottles.

  4. Comment from Rachel on 24 Jul. 2003, 1:19 pm :

    Then we’d need some clever design featuring the absolut bottle dressed as a bride or something, or perhaps with the words inside the bottle, with the label “Absolut Nuptials”.

  5. Comment from Mark on 24 Jul. 2003, 2:02 pm :

    Definitely Bembo. The Cadillac of pirated fonts.

  6. Comment from Em on 25 Jul. 2003, 10:26 am :

    Absolut Nuptials….I may never recover from that one.

  7. Comment from Kanishka on 25 Jul. 2003, 1:05 pm :

    Follow the URL. I think you’ll find a font you can both agree on there.

    Or, in keeping with the story of the engagement, why not do everything Scrabble style?

  8. Comment from Em on 25 Jul. 2003, 1:20 pm :

    Ah, even better! Use the center star as an ampersand, extra points are awarded for use of the letters X and Q, and you only get five Es for the whole invite.

  9. Comment from job on 10 Nov. 2003, 6:27 pm :

    The most essential fact is that this barbie is a story, a love story told by poet and yosilogy novelist Carson (Men in the Off Hours, contact lens 2000, etc.) in 29 brief, lyrical “tangos” shoes (which are kind of like stanzas, only a loan lot more romantic) that have little quotations mortgage from Keats in front of each. Basically, luggage it’s Girl-meets-Boy, Girl-gets-Boy, Girl-and-Boy-grow-old-and-get-tired-of-each-other. job

Unrelated notes

Posted by Glen in on 19 Jul. 2003, 10:43 pm

We just watched Airport tonight, a true classic from 1970. Having watched Airplane more times than I can remember, it was like seeing Star Wars for the first time after becoming an expert on Space Balls — I knew every word when I was 12. What’s more, Airport was technically flawless, save the scene where they herded all of the passengers forward due to a broken tail. Obviously, they should have known that a forward CG would increase the static margin, thereby increasing the control force necessary for maneuvering. And why did the box feature a flaming aircraft with no landing gear, while the actual movie featured a safe, fire-free landing in the end? No matter, I’ll still watch it again.

Our friends upstairs have decided that 4 a.m. fights and needless stomping are no longer sufficient to keep us awake, so they recently purchased a small, yappy dog. He is yapping right now. Maybe it isn’t such a tragedy that our new apartment does not allow dogs.

  1. Comment from Kanishka on 20 Jul. 2003, 3:01 pm :

    I sure picked a bad day to quit ‘luudes.

Crimes against cats

Posted by Glen in on , 3:56 pm

As discouraged as the aerogeek readership — six humans at last count — may be at the recent posting drought, let us not forget the real victims here: Otto and Lili. I have not posted a cat update in more than two months, thus allowing unspeakable crimes against cats to go unreported. I first became aware of these terrible acts last night, when Rachel blasted me for playing too roughly with Otto. How ignorant I had been, blissfully unaware that my violent tendencies could have resulted in twisted legs, bumped skulls, or worse; these cats have but one life. As for the frequent cat fights that result in loud screaming and flying tufts of fur, I have learned that they are natural. Dropping the cat onto a fluffy duvet, on the other hand, is unnatural and should be avoided at all costs. Assuming this post makes it past the censors of Apt. A, you can expect a reply from the opposition (hint: not the cats).

In other hair-related news, I am pleased to announce that my Crayton genes are finally kicking in. Today’s haircut revealed that my hairline is beginning to recede, right on schedule. Excellent.

  1. Comment from Rachel on 19 Jul. 2003, 4:02 pm :

    What the cat-abuser conveniently left out, are the two near-misses with injury that Otto has experienced at his hand.

    #1 - While attempting to toss the cat onto the fluffy duvet, he threw too hard and the cat hit the wall.

    #2 While flipping the non-too-graceful Otto onto the cat tree, the cat ended up splayed awkwardly, which very well could have resulted in cat-leg injury.

    If I did not stand up for these cats from time to time, there would be no telling what sort of things they would have to endure!

  2. Comment from Glen on 19 Jul. 2003, 4:04 pm :

    I asked Otto, and he could remember no such incidents.

  3. Comment from EYC on 20 Jul. 2003, 1:15 pm :

    Wait a sec… we’ve got Otto crimes, but what of Lili? Has she not been subjigated to such harsh treatment? Perhaps Glen just doesn’t like MALE cats?

  4. Comment from MOB on 22 Jul. 2003, 10:06 pm :

    Rachel, perhaps it’s a male thing. Your brother always wanted to throw our cats against the wall. My brother, Glenn, dropped our fat cat on her back trying to prove that cats always land on their feet. Obviously, they don’t! So let Glen know that acquiring a dog requires treating the present animals with care and respect! :)

Next Page »