No free lunch

Posted by Glen in on 30 Apr. 2003, 2:49 pm

Warning: The following nerd rant may not be suitable for some readers.

Lurking on Slashdot the other day, I ran across an article that finally convinced me to try legalizing my mp3 habit. The article dealt with the RIAA losing a lawsuit against a couple of peer-to-peer (mp3 swapping) software companies, but it was the barrage of jubilant Slashdot reader comments that floored me. I believe the ruling was fair, but here were hundreds of intelligent people—software engineers, real engineers, nerds of other persuasions—hailing it as a confirmation of their God-given right to freely trade copyrighted music, missing the point entirely. Admittedly, yours truly has often dabbled in the illicit mp3 trade, but I also believe that artists, producers, labels, and everyone else in the business have every right to charge money for their music. If they want to get serious about enforcing their copyrights, how can we object? Yes, the industry has been terribly slow in updating their business models to accommodate the Internet, and yes, they should learn to tolerate mp3 swapping until they can offer a reasonable (convenient) alternative. I just take issue with the free lunch advocates — those who argue that music, software, and intellectual property in general should be free and that companies should evolve accordingly. If the cold war were still on, I’d grumble and call them communists. Instead, I’ll just call them morons. Anyway, out of spite for the mp3-or-die crowd, I recently signed up for Rhapsody, a pay service that lets you stream and burn major-label tracks. First impressions are that the service is awesome, but it needs a larger catalog of music. There is sooo much potential for this concept to replace CDs once the labels and artists conquer their mp3-induced Internet fears.

As for the related topic of open-source software, I’ll be brief. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, and for all of their anti-Microsoft bitching, the open-source crowd spends an awful lot of time mimicking existing Windows products. Face it: Windows is still the best consumer OS for the PC, and Linux will remain in second place as long as it tries only to follow Windows’ lead. Also, open source advocates’ frequent use of “M$” as an insult only underscores some of the problems with open-source as a business model. I generally have no problem with open-source development and have participated in it myself, but enough with the mindless Microsoft-bashing. As Mark might say, this is intellectual laziness.

Okay, I’m done.

  1. Comment from Glen on 30 Apr. 2003, 4:09 pm :

    Okay, not everybody on Slashdot is a zealot. See link.

  2. Comment from Angela on 30 Apr. 2003, 6:41 pm :

    My Glen, that entry was worthy of a place on the NYTimes Op/Ed. page. I like my free mp3s but you make quite a strong argument. Well done.

    I’m using WebTV at the hotel. Do you reckon this is the first comment on your site posted via WebTV? :-)

  3. Comment from Glen on 30 Apr. 2003, 6:56 pm :

    The mp3 subject has been beaten to death many times over, but it continues to amaze me that so many people believe they have a *right* to get all their music for free.

    I reckon yours is, indeed, the first WebTV comment! Is my site even viewable on WebTV?

  4. Comment from Angela on 1 May. 2003, 5:17 pm :

    Yes, your site is quite viewable on WebTV. It appears as kind of a large screen shot, so you have to use the keyboard arrows (there wasn’t a mouse) to see the whole page and there were the additional options of zooming in and out with Ctrl Z or X.

    I didn’t say I had a -right- to free mp3s, I just said I like them. I like free rides in G-IV SPs too :-D

  5. Comment from Glen on 1 May. 2003, 5:38 pm :

    I didn’t say you said you had a right to free mp3s! I was just explaining the source of my rant (Slashdot nerds who have warped views on copyrights and capitalism).

Getting hot in here

Posted by Glen in on 28 Apr. 2003, 12:43 pm

I awoke at 7:00 this morning after four hours of sleep and couldn’t fall back asleep; somebody must have lit a fire under my ass [Insert cliché action movie call to arms here, such as “It’s go time” or “Lock and load”]. Something about the semester being almost over, blah blah blah, three projects to finish, yadda yadda yadda, a thesis to write, etc. In other words, little more than the date has changed in the last month. Step 1: Update blog. Step 2: ??? Step 3: Look back on grad school accomplishments.

Speaking of fire, Rachel made blackened salmon last night. That was some fine fish, but my respiratory system is still reeling from a severe case of smoke inhalation. Previous blackening episodes have left one or two rooms in the apartment relatively smoke-free, but Rachel went all-out this time. There was so much smoke that a thick layer formed three feet off the ground, extending to the ceiling and eliminating any chance of normal breathing while standing, just like in those fire safety videos where they light the curtains on fire and the temperature rises to 3000 degrees within two minutes. Falling back on my elementary school training from the Urbana Fire Department, I dropped to the ground and crawled over to my window, crouching there and gasping for precious fresh air for a few minutes while the place aired out. Dave one-upped me with a damp cloth, enabling him to enter the kitchen long enough to fetch his plate and retreat back to his room to eat while the food was still hot. Rachel and the cats were strangely unaffected, going about their business as usual.

Tomorrow: A much-needed rant about no-free-lunch, the open source movement, and why kneejerk anti-RIAA types have persuaded me to kick my Kazaa habit.

  1. Comment from Katie on 28 Apr. 2003, 1:06 pm :

    The fact that you and Dave needed to take such drastic measures to breathe while Rachel and the cats went about business as normal just proves a fundamental law of the day: Men are inferior.

  2. Comment from Kanishka on 28 Apr. 2003, 3:33 pm :

    Correction — “Hot in herrrrre”

  3. Comment from Hot Chick on 28 Apr. 2003, 4:04 pm :

    I am getting so hot, I wanna take my clothes off….

  4. Comment from Glen on 28 Apr. 2003, 7:43 pm :

    Two r’s. Hot in herre.

  5. Comment from EYC on 28 Apr. 2003, 7:43 pm :

    Katie, or perhaps women just have an under-developed sense of smell? *sigh* Women…

  6. Comment from Katie on 28 Apr. 2003, 8:25 pm :

    Sense of smell? I believe it’s a matter of being able to breathe, not smell…

  7. Comment from EYC on 28 Apr. 2003, 8:35 pm :

    So you’re saying tha Rachel can’t cook? Nice sister….

  8. Comment from your sister on 28 Apr. 2003, 10:13 pm :

    In what was … PERHAPS … a coincidence, I nearly set our deck aflame yesterday evening while attempting to grill steaks. Eric happened to go outside and discover the conflagration that was occurring in the grill. Note to self: must clean gas grill before each use; otherwise, old food particles act as kindling.

  9. Comment from EYC on 29 Apr. 2003, 11:17 am :

    Too funny….

  10. Comment from Mother of the Bride on 29 Apr. 2003, 4:33 pm :

    It makes sense that Rachel and the cats were unaffected BECAUSE THEY’RE HORIZONTALLY CHALLENGED! :) Also, Rachel, you must stop treating Glen as an idol! Giving him burnt offerings! REALLY! (Sorry, Bible joke, couldn’t resist! heehee)

  11. Comment from Mother of the Bride on 29 Apr. 2003, 4:35 pm :

    Oops! My bad! VERTICALLY CHALLENGED! (I only have two bachellor’s degrees, no graduate)

  12. Comment from EYC on 29 Apr. 2003, 7:47 pm :

    This family completely kills me!

Circular reasoning

Posted by Glen in on 23 Apr. 2003, 3:31 pm

The “solution” to this puzzle has been bothering me. It states that “the circle is NOT the only shape with constant diameter,” but I say the circle IS the only [2D] shape with constant diameter! Lots of other shapes can satisfy the “manhole” problem, but only the circle has constant diameter — defined as “a chord passing through the center of a figure or body” (Webster). The problem with any non-circular manhole shape is that its constant-length “diameters” do not all pass through the geometric center. Because this puzzle was posted in a .edu domain and due to the fact that I’ve seen similar claims elsewhere on sciency websites, I feel the need to set the record straight. Please correct me if I’m missing something.

Sorry, I just had to get that off my chest.

  1. Comment from EYC on 23 Apr. 2003, 4:47 pm :

    They get away with a technicality - when people think of ’shape’, they assume a regular shape. Stoopid people… I think that you should write to them and threaten them with Danica McKellar (whatever happened to her, anyway?).

  2. Comment from Glen on 23 Apr. 2003, 4:55 pm :

    No, but that’s not the issue. Their shapes, no matter how odd (no pun intended, since the number of sides must be odd), do just fine as manhole covers. The issue is their use of the word “diameter”. So I’m catching them on a technicality.

  3. Comment from EYC on 23 Apr. 2003, 6:47 pm :

    Okay, I see. Regardless, they’re whack.

  4. Comment from Mike on 24 Apr. 2003, 2:03 am :

    I assume this was brought on by this review?

    This sounds like a good read actually… I may pick it up.

  5. Comment from Kanishka on 24 Apr. 2003, 7:48 am :

    What about a 2-d torus? Or is that just a variation on a theme of circle?

  6. Comment from Em on 24 Apr. 2003, 9:22 am :

    Gwendolyn, did you click on “Danica McKellar’s Website” on the solution page? Some bad things happened, and I may no longer be employed….

  7. Comment from Nick on 24 Apr. 2003, 10:34 am :

    You are absolutely correct. The general definition for diameter is “A line passing from side to side of any body through the centre” (ref. OED). The ‘definiton’ they’re working with is false.

  8. Comment from Glen on 24 Apr. 2003, 12:26 pm :

    Mike: Damn, you’re good.
    Kanishka: I should have been more specific and specified a 2D convex shape.
    Em: Yes, and the results were unfortunate.
    Nick: That’s what I’m saying!

For updates sake

Posted by Glen in on 22 Apr. 2003, 1:46 am

This weekend I hung one of those multi-photo frames on my wall, and now the photos keep falling toward the bottom of the frame whenever the guy upstairs stomps around — which is, at last estimate, 22 hours per day (he sleeps from 1-3 p.m.). I would sleep in the living room, but Dave and his Physics friend have been spending 15 hours per day there playing Zelda — literally. That would even be acceptable, were it not for Physics Guy’s personal hygiene issues (featuring the furniture-permeating power of super-concentrated B.O.!). Okay, now I’m being mean, but the August move is still looking awfully good right about now.

Speaking of the move, did I mention that we will be living next to a corn field? Like most corn in Illinois, the ears grown in this field are destined for gas tanks or cow stomachs — and ultimately next year’s corn fields. Nevertheless, I’m determined to find out what “feed” corn really tastes like.

We drove to Peoria this weekend to pick out tuxedos for the wedding. Yup, Peoria. It’s everything we imagined, and more. Groomsmen: I’ll try to remember to send an email between now and September, but if you happen to find yourself in a Men’s Warehouse having measurements taken in the meantime, be sure to mention the Dimock/Michaud wedding so they can hook you up.

It should be abundantly clear by now that I have very little to report, so you may want to check out this other, crappier website instead.

Carl — there will be plenty of bird updates soon.

  1. Comment from Mother of the Bride on 22 Apr. 2003, 9:23 am :

    Thank you for not mentioning how many strokes per tooth when you brushed. :)

  2. Comment from grandmother of the bride on 22 Apr. 2003, 11:49 am :

    comment Glen: I am properly impressed with your update. And enjoyed seeing Rachel’s picture with the jewelry she is so excited about. Isn’t she gorgeous!

  3. Comment from Glen on 22 Apr. 2003, 5:26 pm :

    Of course!

    As for tooth-brushing, we have one of those electric toothbrushes. It probably does around 85 strokes per tooth.

  4. Comment from Em on 23 Apr. 2003, 3:13 pm :

    Ew, one toothbrush between you?! ;)

  5. Comment from Glen on 23 Apr. 2003, 3:42 pm :

    Ew, no! Oral-B sells individual heads, afforably priced at $7 each. Or, if you’re like us, you can buy them in bulk at Sam’s Club. When it comes to soap, rice and toothbrush heads, we’re prepared for a seven-year nuclear fallout.

  6. Comment from Em on 24 Apr. 2003, 9:18 am :

    Individual head, eh? That’s the way YO MAMA likes it!

Jewelry FOUND!

Posted by Rachel in on 21 Apr. 2003, 11:23 pm

Huge thanks to Mike who sent me the most AWESOME jewelry set for the wedding day.

Isn’t it great? I think the ring is WAY better than the ring Glen picked out. Thank you Mike! I was most worried about finding the appropriate jewelry! And, as a special bonus, it came with a swell purse to carry the jewelry in when I’m not wearing it (so not too often!). Hey ladies, if you want to get a great set like this for yourself, it’s made by the most exclusive designer “Little Miss.” It’s the “Bridal Jewelry Set” and is available in only the finest stores. It’s only for ages 5 & up though, so don’t give it to your 4 year old bride-to-be.

  1. Comment from Angela on 22 Apr. 2003, 8:41 am :

    How beautiful! The plastic bling bling really flatters you :-)

  2. Comment from Mother of the Bride on 22 Apr. 2003, 9:20 am :

    Too cool, Rach! As a matter of fact, it looks familiar. I think one of your sisters had something similiar when growing up. Maybe I should go to the dungeon and find it for them to use as bridesmaids!

  3. Comment from Rachel on 22 Apr. 2003, 9:59 am :

    Mom - That would be GREAT! If you can’t find it, then maybe sets like these would make great bridesmaid’s gifts!

  4. Comment from Sister of the Bride on 22 Apr. 2003, 11:41 am :

    I do believe that one of your sisters would be me, and the set I had came with “Dress ‘n Dazzle.” I got it for christmas and for days I was the belle of the house with my little lip sticks and plastic jewleries!

  5. Comment from Always a Bridesmaid on 22 Apr. 2003, 3:50 pm :

    That would be a GREAT wedding-party gift! But only as long as you also get the plastic high heels….

  6. Comment from Chick who knows the bride on 22 Apr. 2003, 10:43 pm :

    Wait wait wait…. Where’s the tiara, for heaven’s sake?

Next Page »