No free lunch
Posted by Glen in on 30 Apr. 2003, 2:49 pm
Warning: The following nerd rant may not be suitable for some readers.
Lurking on Slashdot the other day, I ran across an article that finally convinced me to try legalizing my mp3 habit. The article dealt with the RIAA losing a lawsuit against a couple of peer-to-peer (mp3 swapping) software companies, but it was the barrage of jubilant Slashdot reader comments that floored me. I believe the ruling was fair, but here were hundreds of intelligent people—software engineers, real engineers, nerds of other persuasions—hailing it as a confirmation of their God-given right to freely trade copyrighted music, missing the point entirely. Admittedly, yours truly has often dabbled in the illicit mp3 trade, but I also believe that artists, producers, labels, and everyone else in the business have every right to charge money for their music. If they want to get serious about enforcing their copyrights, how can we object? Yes, the industry has been terribly slow in updating their business models to accommodate the Internet, and yes, they should learn to tolerate mp3 swapping until they can offer a reasonable (convenient) alternative. I just take issue with the free lunch advocates — those who argue that music, software, and intellectual property in general should be free and that companies should evolve accordingly. If the cold war were still on, I’d grumble and call them communists. Instead, I’ll just call them morons. Anyway, out of spite for the mp3-or-die crowd, I recently signed up for Rhapsody, a pay service that lets you stream and burn major-label tracks. First impressions are that the service is awesome, but it needs a larger catalog of music. There is sooo much potential for this concept to replace CDs once the labels and artists conquer their mp3-induced Internet fears.
As for the related topic of open-source software, I’ll be brief. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, and for all of their anti-Microsoft bitching, the open-source crowd spends an awful lot of time mimicking existing Windows products. Face it: Windows is still the best consumer OS for the PC, and Linux will remain in second place as long as it tries only to follow Windows’ lead. Also, open source advocates’ frequent use of “M$” as an insult only underscores some of the problems with open-source as a business model. I generally have no problem with open-source development and have participated in it myself, but enough with the mindless Microsoft-bashing. As Mark might say, this is intellectual laziness.
Okay, I’m done.

Comment from Glen on 30 Apr. 2003, 4:09 pm :
Okay, not everybody on Slashdot is a zealot. See link.
Comment from Angela on 30 Apr. 2003, 6:41 pm :
My Glen, that entry was worthy of a place on the NYTimes Op/Ed. page. I like my free mp3s but you make quite a strong argument. Well done.
I’m using WebTV at the hotel. Do you reckon this is the first comment on your site posted via WebTV?
Comment from Glen on 30 Apr. 2003, 6:56 pm :
The mp3 subject has been beaten to death many times over, but it continues to amaze me that so many people believe they have a *right* to get all their music for free.
I reckon yours is, indeed, the first WebTV comment! Is my site even viewable on WebTV?
Comment from Angela on 1 May. 2003, 5:17 pm :
Yes, your site is quite viewable on WebTV. It appears as kind of a large screen shot, so you have to use the keyboard arrows (there wasn’t a mouse) to see the whole page and there were the additional options of zooming in and out with Ctrl Z or X.
I didn’t say I had a -right- to free mp3s, I just said I like them. I like free rides in G-IV SPs too
Comment from Glen on 1 May. 2003, 5:38 pm :
I didn’t say you said you had a right to free mp3s! I was just explaining the source of my rant (Slashdot nerds who have warped views on copyrights and capitalism).